From Crypto to Capitol Hill: The Policy Shift Revealed at SmartCon 2025

The “From Crypto to Capitol Hill” theme at SmartCon 2025 wasn’t just marketing - it represented a genuine policy shift. I’ve been tracking blockchain regulation for years, and this event marked the clearest signal yet of Washington’s evolving approach.

The Policy Participants Who Showed Up

Government officials participating in SmartCon:

  • U.S. Representative Bryan Steil (House Financial Services Committee)
  • Patrick Witt (White House Digital Assets Advisory Council Executive Director)
  • David Mills (Federal Reserve Senior Deputy Director)

Three years ago, these officials wouldn’t attend. Today, they’re presenting alongside blockchain builders.

From Resistance to Collaboration

2021-2022: Adversarial hearings, enforcement-first approach
2023: Regulatory clarity discussions begin
2024: GENIUS Act passes (stablecoins)
2025: SmartCon shows collaborative engagement

The tone has fundamentally changed.

What I Observed at SmartCon

  1. Substance over rhetoric: Real policy discussions, not just advocacy
  2. Bipartisan participation: Both sides of aisle represented
  3. Federal Reserve engagement: Central bank seriously exploring blockchain
  4. Industry maturity: Professional, compliance-focused presentations

Key Policy Themes

Financial Innovation:

  • How to enable innovation while protecting consumers
  • Risk-based regulatory frameworks
  • International coordination (US, EU, Asia)

Market Integrity:

  • Preventing manipulation and fraud
  • Investor protections
  • Custody and security standards

National Competitiveness:

  • Keeping blockchain innovation in United States
  • Preventing talent and capital flight to friendlier jurisdictions
  • Balancing regulation with competitiveness

My Questions for Policy Experts

  1. What’s the legislative pipeline for 2026?
  2. How will Fed approach CBDCs vs private stablecoins?
  3. What does SEC securities framework look like post-SmartCon?
  4. How does international coordination work in practice?
  5. What can industry do to support good policy?

Looking for insights from legislative staffers, Fed researchers, SEC policy experts, and anyone tracking DC developments.

#Policy #Regulation #GENIUS #FIT21 #SEC #Fed

David Mills (Fed Senior Deputy Director) participating in SmartCon was extraordinary. The Federal Reserve doesn’t send senior officials to industry events lightly. Let me share the Fed’s perspective on blockchain and CBDCs.

Federal Reserve’s Blockchain Research

The Fed has been studying blockchain technology since 2016:

  • Wholesale CBDC pilots (bank-to-bank settlement)
  • Retail CBDC research (consumer digital dollar)
  • Private stablecoin monitoring
  • DLT for securities settlement

CBDC Exploration Status (2025)

Retail CBDC (Digital Dollar for Consumers):

Current stance:

  • Research ongoing, no decision to launch
  • Pilot programs with select banks
  • Privacy and design trade-offs being studied
  • Timeline: No launch before 2027 at earliest

Key Questions Fed Is Addressing:

  1. Does U.S. need retail CBDC? (Stablecoins may suffice)
  2. Privacy: How much anonymity vs AML compliance?
  3. Disintermediation: Impact on commercial banks?
  4. Technology: Centralized vs distributed ledger?
  5. International: Coordination with other central banks?

Wholesale CBDC (Bank Settlement):

More advanced:

  • Project Hamilton (MIT + Boston Fed research)
  • 1.7 million transactions per second achieved in testing
  • Instant settlement between banks
  • Lower operational risk

Likelihood: Higher than retail CBDC
Timeline: Potential pilot 2026-2027

Private Stablecoins vs CBDC

Fed’s evolving view post-GENIUS Act:

Previous concern: Private stablecoins could threaten monetary policy
Current view: Well-regulated stablecoins can complement Fed’s role

Why the shift:

  • GENIUS Act provides oversight (Fed role in non-bank issuers)
  • 100% reserve requirements align with safety
  • Innovation happening regardless - better to regulate than ban
  • International competition (China’s digital yuan, EU digital euro)

Coexistence Model:

  • Private stablecoins for everyday transactions (Visa/Mastercard equivalent)
  • CBDC for wholesale settlement (Fed funds equivalent)
  • Both can work together

Monetary Policy Implications

Fed studying how blockchain affects:

  1. Money supply: Do stablecoins expand M2? (Yes, somewhat)
  2. Velocity: Faster settlement = higher velocity
  3. Credit creation: How do banks lend in tokenized world?
  4. Interest rates: Transmission mechanism changes?

Current assessment: Manageable impact, not threatening core monetary policy tools.

Bank-Blockchain Integration

Fed’s guidance to banks (2020-2025 evolution):

  • 2020: Banks can custody crypto (OCC letter)
  • 2021: Banks can run validators (OCC letter)
  • 2024: Banks can issue stablecoins (refined guidance)
  • 2025: Banks encouraged to explore blockchain settlement

This is significant deregulation/clarification.

International Coordination

Fed working with:

  • BIS (Bank for International Settlements): Central bank digital currency research
  • ECB (European Central Bank): Digital euro coordination
  • Bank of England: Wholesale CBDC pilots
  • Monetary Authority of Singapore: Project Guardian collaboration

Goal: Interoperable CBDCs and stablecoin frameworks globally.

SmartCon Participation Significance

David Mills attending SmartCon signals:

  1. Fed taking private sector innovation seriously
  2. Collaborative approach (not just regulate from outside)
  3. Learning from builders
  4. Openness to public blockchain use cases

This is cultural shift within Fed.

Timeline Predictions

My expectations:

  • 2026: Wholesale CBDC pilot announced
  • 2027: Retail CBDC decision (likely “not needed yet”)
  • 2028: Stablecoin-CBDC interoperability standards
  • 2030+: If retail CBDC launched, gradual rollout

To @alex_policy’s question:

Fed approach to CBDCs vs private stablecoins: Coexistence, not competition.

  • Regulate private stablecoins well (GENIUS Act framework)
  • Explore wholesale CBDC for bank settlement
  • Defer retail CBDC unless clear need emerges
  • Enable interoperability between all forms

This pragmatic approach allows innovation while maintaining Fed’s monetary policy role.

#FederalReserve #CBDC #MonetaryPolicy #Stablecoins

As someone tracking SEC policy, the shift in approach has been dramatic. Let me explain where securities regulation stands post-SmartCon 2025.

The SEC Framework Evolution

2017-2021: Enforcement-First Era

  • “Every ICO is a security” approach
  • Enforcement actions without clear rules
  • Industry frustration

2022-2024: Clarification Begins

  • Howey Test applied to tokens
  • Investment contract analysis framework
  • Some clarity, still gaps

2025: Post-SmartCon Framework

  • FIT21 bill pending (clear commodity/security split)
  • Productive dialogue with industry
  • Focus on fraud prevention, not innovation blocking

Token Classification Framework

When Is a Token a Security?

Applying Howey Test (1946 Supreme Court):

  1. Investment of money
  2. Common enterprise
  3. Expectation of profits
  4. From efforts of others

SEC’s Current Approach:

Clearly Securities:

  • Tokens sold in ICO/presale
  • Team controls protocol
  • Ongoing development promises
  • Marketing emphasizes profits

Likely Not Securities:

  • Fully decentralized protocols
  • No identifiable issuer
  • Functional utility (not investment)
  • Sufficiently decentralized (Ethereum 2.0 example)

Gray Area (Most Tokens):
Depends on facts and circumstances - this is the problem FIT21 aims to solve.

Exchange Registration Pathways

Current Options:

1. National Securities Exchange (Traditional)

  • Full SEC registration (Form 1)
  • SRO (Self-Regulatory Organization) requirements
  • Expensive, time-consuming
  • Example: None yet for crypto-native

2. ATS (Alternative Trading System)

  • Register as broker-dealer + ATS
  • Lower barriers than full exchange
  • Limited to securities
  • Example: tZERO (security tokens)

3. Special Purpose Broker-Dealer (SPBD)

  • New framework under discussion
  • Tailored for digital assets
  • Custody, market making allowed
  • Timeline: 2026 proposed rules

FIT21 Impact:

If passed, creates clear path for commodity token exchanges (CFTC regulated, not SEC).

Custody Rule Updates

SEC Custody Rule (Amended 2024):

For RIAs (Registered Investment Advisers):

  • Must use qualified custodian for client crypto assets
  • Qualified custodian = Bank, trust company, registered broker-dealer
  • Surprise exam requirements
  • Crypto-specific provisions

What Changed:

  • Recognizes crypto custody is different
  • Allows specialized crypto custodians (if qualified)
  • Addresses DeFi staking, lending
  • More flexible than initial proposal

Industry can now comply - Fidelity, Coinbase, Anchorage qualify.

Enforcement vs Guidance Balance

Past Criticism:
“Regulation by enforcement” - sued companies without clear rules

Current Approach:

  • More guidance (Staff Accounting Bulletins, no-action letters)
  • Proposed rules before enforcement
  • Industry consultation
  • Enforcement reserved for clear fraud

Better balance, though still room for improvement.

DeFi Regulation Challenges

The DeFi Problem:

Traditional regulation assumes:

  • Identifiable issuer
  • Centralized control
  • Geographic jurisdiction

DeFi protocols:

  • No single issuer
  • Decentralized governance
  • Global, borderless

SEC’s Struggle:
How to regulate protocols without attacking developers?

Emerging Framework (Not Final):

  • Focus on interfaces (centralized access points)
  • DAO treasury as quasi-entity
  • Token sales = securities (regardless of protocol)
  • Protocol itself? Still unclear

Industry Input:
DeFi Education Fund, others working with SEC on framework.

International Coordination

MiCA (EU Markets in Crypto-Assets):

  • Comprehensive EU framework (effective 2024)
  • Passport system (license in one country, operate EU-wide)
  • Clear rules for stablecoins, utility tokens, security tokens

SEC Coordination:

  • Regular dialogue with ESMA (EU securities regulator)
  • Mutual recognition discussions
  • Global baseline standards emerging

Challenge: Same token, different treatment across jurisdictions.

Staking Regulatory Clarity

Current Ambiguity:

Is staking a security?

  • Kraken settled with SEC (stopped staking-as-a-service)
  • Coinbase fighting SEC lawsuit
  • Industry wants clarity

Likely Resolution:

Non-Custodial Staking: Not a security (you control tokens)
Custodial Staking-as-a-Service: May be security (investment contract)

Congressional legislation expected to clarify (2026).

What Industry Should Expect

2026 Regulatory Roadmap:

Q1-Q2: FIT21 passes - commodity/security distinction clear
Q2-Q3: SPBD framework proposed - exchange registration path
Q3-Q4: Staking clarity - legislation or SEC guidance
Q4: DeFi framework discussion draft

2027: Implementation begins, first registrations under new rules

SmartCon’s Impact on SEC

Industry participation at SmartCon with government officials sends signal to SEC:

  • Blockchain is mainstream financial infrastructure
  • Collaborative engagement works better than adversarial
  • Clear rules benefit everyone (SEC, industry, investors)

Expect more constructive SEC approach in 2026.

To @alex_policy’s Questions:

SEC securities framework post-SmartCon:

  1. FIT21 creates commodity/security split
  2. SPBD provides exchange registration path
  3. Custody rule updated for crypto
  4. Staking clarity coming via legislation
  5. DeFi framework emerging (slowly)
  6. Enforcement balanced with guidance

Still work to do, but trajectory is positive.

#SEC #Securities #Regulation #FIT21 #Compliance