Past Work Experience Interview

Target Audience

Individuals with some or little experience, or those who have not held any leadership or design positions in their careers (whether formal or informal).

Problem Description

Describe a project experience from your past that you found particularly interesting or memorable. Follow-up questions include:

• Why did you find it interesting?
• What was the most challenging part of the project, and how did you address those challenges?
• What did you learn from this project? What would you have liked to know before starting the project?
• Did you consider other design or implementation methods? Why did you choose the approach you took? If you were to choose again for the same project, what would you do differently?

Interviewer Tips

Since the goal here is to assess a person's technical communication skills and level of interest, and they may have participated in boot camps, you should be prepared to ask them more questions (whether for more details or about other aspects of the project). If they are recent graduates who have just completed their thesis, the thesis is often a good starting point. While this question is similar in many ways to resume questions in phone interviews, the content is about four times that of a phone interview and should be proportionately more detailed in asking what they did. Therefore, while the scoring criteria are similar, they should be evaluated with higher expectations and more data.

Scoring

Excellent candidates can:

• Discuss project experiences thoroughly, with interactions in the interview being a dialogue rather than a directive.
• Have a good understanding of the entire project, not just their area of focus, and be able to clearly articulate the design and intent of the project.
• Show passion for any project and clearly describe the project elements that sparked that passion.
• Clearly explain what alternatives were considered and why they chose the implementation strategy they took.
• Reflect on their experiences and learn from them.

Good candidates may:

• Encounter some questions in the interview but can resolve them with the interviewer's help.
• Lack a broader understanding of the project but still have a strong grasp of the parts they interacted with directly and specific areas.
• Appear passionate but may struggle to accurately explain where that passion comes from.
• Discuss alternatives they considered but may not have thought deeply about them.
• Reflect on their past experiences and draw lessons from them.

Poor candidates exhibit:

• Struggle during the interview, making the interviewer feel like the candidate is interrogating them rather than having a conversation.
• Lack detailed knowledge of the project even in their field of work. They may not understand why their product was designed that way or how it interacts with other systems.
• When asked about the most interesting projects they have worked on, they should show interest in the product, but in fact, they may appear disinterested.
• Be unfamiliar with potential alternative implementation methods.
• Seem not to have reflected on or learned from their past project experiences. A key indicator of this situation is that answers to "What did you learn?" and "What would you do differently?" are very brief or nearly identical.